Analysis of periodic pumping tests in a fractured rock mass based on the generalized radial-flow model

Clicks: 8
ID: 331937
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #326 of 337 articles by views in geophysical journal international

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 337 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Summary We evaluated periodic pumping tests carried out in boreholes penetrating fractured gneiss in the research mine “Reiche Zeche”, Freiberg, Germany, employing a fractional diffusion equation, known as the generalized radial-flow (GRF) model. Water was injected into three borehole intervals, successively isolated by a double-packer probe. The three intervals correspond to distinct hydraulic conduits: (i) an induced axial fracture, (ii) a stimulated pre-existing radial fracture, and (iii) a fault zone intersecting the borehole at a near-normal angle. Pressure responses were monitored in sections of up to four monitoring boreholes. We evaluated the collected data by two spectral methods, injectivity analysis and interference analysis. The former exploits flow rate and pressure of the injection interval, whereas the latter relies on pressure records only, namely that of monitoring sections and of the injection intervals. In the GRF-framework, interference analysis yields a unique pair of flow dimension and hydraulic diffusivity, while the two observables of the spectral injectivity analysis, amplitude ratio and phase shift, only constrain admissible ranges of the three involved unknowns, flow dimension, hydraulic diffusivity, and conductivity. We addressed this under-determinateness by two combinations of spectral parameters from injectivity and interference observations. Even when accounting for the effects of finite length, storage capacity, skin, and non-parallelism of injection intervals and monitoring sections on the spectral parameters, it seems difficult to reconcile the bulk of our observations with the predictions of the GRF model. In cases, however, the gained fractal flow dimensions may bear geometrical significance, as for the likely anastomosing fault zone. The decrease in fractional flow regime with increasing mean interval pressure observed for two hydraulic paths between injection intervals and monitoring sections points towards a role of hydromechanical coupling in flow localization.
Reference Key
openalex_W7221193392 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal geophysical journal international
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/gji/ggag434
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.