Structure-activity relationship and membrane-targeting mechanisms of shikimate-related metabolites against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria

Clicks: 21
ID: 331911
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #175 of 222 articles by views in Journal of applied microbiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 222 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
AIMS: The rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria has intensified the search for novel antimicrobials. In this context, shikimic acid is a versatile scaffold widely used as a precursor to bioactive compounds and drugs. This study screened the antimicrobial activity and underlying mechanism of 18 shikimate-related metabolites against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus epidermidis. METHODS AND RESULTS: The antimicrobial activity of the metabolites was initially evaluated by determining their minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid, and α-methylhydrocinnamic acid exhibited the lowest MIC values and were selected for further evaluation of bacterial inactivation kinetics and effects on bacterial cell surface and membrane integrity. α-Methylhydrocinnamic acid showed rapid antibacterial effects with maximum reductions of 3.2 and 3.9 log CFU.mL-1 for E. coli and S. epidermidis, respectively. Caffeic acid and p-coumaric acid were less effective, particularly against E. coli, where antimicrobial activity plateaued over time. In E. coli, caffeic acid and p-coumaric acid increased surface hydrophilicity by 15% and 46%, respectively, whereas in S. epidermidis, p-coumaric acid and α-methylhydrocinnamic acid reduced hydrophilicity by 55% and 67%. Zeta potential measurements showed less negative surface charges in E. coli following treatment with p-coumaric acid and α-methylhydrocinnamic acid, whereas in S. epidermidis, α-methylhydrocinnamic acid increased surface charge. Additionally, α-methylhydrocinnamic acid caused pronounced membrane disruption, with bacterial cells with damaged membranes reaching 70% in E. coli and 90% in S. epidermidis, alongside a 54% increase in K⁺ leakage for E. coli. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the potential of cinnamic acid derivatives, particularly α-methylhydrocinnamic acid, may have potential for further investigation as antibacterial compounds or as adjuncts to conventional antimicrobial strategies.
Reference Key
openalex_W7221088741 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Journal of applied microbiology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jambio/lxag252
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.