Irregularly and incompletely sampled random fields in the Earth sciences: Analysis and synthesis of parameterized covariance models

Clicks: 7
ID: 331893
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #335 of 338 articles by views in geophysical journal international

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 338 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Summary Geophysical data observed in the Earth, planetary, and lunar sciences are spatially limited to sampling plans designed to span a feature of interest whose resolution and regularity in discretization are bound by site, observational, and instrumental constraints. Common wisdom tells us that the more observations we make, the less variable our estimates of statistical properties of measured physical quantities will be. However, given the limited spatial extent and possibly irregular sampling of any dataset, how confident can we be in our estimates of the parameters of statistical processes underlying such fields? We study how sampling geometry contributes to uncertainty in modeling spatial geophysical observations as sampled random fields characterized by stationary, isotropic, parametric covariance functions. We incorporate the signature of discrete spatial sampling patterns into an asymptotically unbiased spectral maximum-likelihood estimation method along with analytical uncertainty calculation. We illustrate the broad applicability of our modeling through synthetic and real data examples with sampling patterns that include irregularly bounded contiguous regions of interest, structured sweeps of instrumental measurements, and missing observations dispersed across the domain of a field, which spur behaviors in the estimator. We find through asymptotic studies that allocating samples following a growing-domain strategy rather than a densifying, infill scheme best reduces estimator bias and (co)variance, whether the field has been sampled regularly or not. As our modeling assumptions, too, shape how (well) an observed random field can be characterized, we study the effect of covariance parameters assumed a priori. We demonstrate the desirable behavior of the general Matérn class and show how to interrogate goodness-of-fit criteria to detect departures from the null hypothesis of Gaussianity, stationarity, and isotropy.
Reference Key
openalex_W7148721614 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Olivia L. Walbert, Frederik J. Simons, Arthur P. Guillaumin, Sofia C. Olhede
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal geophysical journal international
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/gji/ggag425
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggag425
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.