Interpreting Convolutional Neural Networks in Population Genetics

Clicks: 15
ID: 331581
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #201 of 273 articles by views in molecular biology and evolution

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 273 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Machine learning approaches have become a powerful alternative to traditional methods in population genetics. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in particular have been successful in inferring natural selection, recombination rates, introgression, dispersal distances, and effective population size changes. One limitation of CNNs and other deep learning methods is that they can be difficult to interpret. When they have been shown to be as or more successful than summary-statistic-based methods, what are they learning? Here we investigate CNNs from two different methods: the pg-gan discriminator for identifying real vs.∼simulated data, and two networks trained to detect selective sweeps. We first compute correlations between learned network features and traditional summary statistics, then assess whether summary statistics can be predicted from the learned features. To understand the learned features, we compute feature importance through SHAP values and feature groupings through dimensionality reduction. Finally we use decision trees and random forests to build an interpretable "model-of-the-model". Our results reveal that some CNN architectures can implicitly compute summary statistics such as pairwise heterozygosity, while statistics such as the site frequency spectrum are less similar to the network's learned features. We find that long-range linkage disequilibrium is readily approximated by the networks and may be more efficiently computed by CNNs than traditional methods (which are quadratic in the number of sites). Overall, this work contributes to the interpretability of deep learning methods in population genetics by clarifying the relationships between model architecture, learned network features, established summary statistics, and predicted evolutionary parameters.
Reference Key
openalex_W4417171272 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Huiting Xu, Leon Zong, Dylan D. Ray, Lei Lei, Daniel R. Schrider, Franz Baumdicker, Sara Mathieson
Journal molecular biology and evolution
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/molbev/msag256
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msag256
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.