Conservation Genomics Provides Essential Insights for the Management of Endangered Populations and the Utility of Ex Situ Collections for Species Recovery: A Case Study in Encephalartos latifrons

Clicks: 7
ID: 331548
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #246 of 254 articles by views in Annals of botany

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 254 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ex situ collections can be reservoirs for endangered species to be used in reintroductions but critical data on the provenance and genetic diversity of these collections is often lacking. For example, while more than 70% of Cycad species are threatened with extinction, many individuals are held in private collections and botanical gardens. However, their utility is hampered by our limited understanding of genetic diversity among wild populations and unknown provenance of many ex situ plants. Conservation genomics can meet both challenges by providing estimates of allelic diversity among both wild and ex situ plants, and by identifying source populations of ex situ collections. We demonstrate this approach with Encephalartos latifrons, a Critically Endangered species occurring at the edge of a close relative, E. longifolius. Recently documented populations could potentially double the number of E. latifrons plants in the wild but are of unknown identity due to complex morphological trait distributions. METHODS: We assessed genetic structure, genetic diversity, and gene flow among populations. Coancestry was used to assign ex situ individuals to species/population of origin. We also assessed the allelic diversity of in situ populations captured in ex situ collections. KEY RESULTS: Newly documented populations of Encephalartos do not belong to E. latifrons. Populations are not inbred and genetic diversity is relatively high. Ex situ collections harbor a substantial amount of allelic diversity, but this is not evenly distributed nor redundant across sites. Multiple individuals in ex situ collections were not assigned to their species of record. CONCLUSIONS: This work highlights the promise and pitfalls of using ex situ collections in the restoration of endangered species and the effective role that conservation genomics can play in determining their actual conservation value. Comprehensive genomic analyses are essential to maintain the genetic structure and diversity of wild populations.
Reference Key
openalex_W7220476285 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Brian L. Dorsey, John Donaldson, Vanessa Handley, Regina Mettey, Caroline Marie Iacuaniello, uPhakamani M'Afrika Xaba, Carin Swart, Christy Powell
Journal Annals of botany
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/aob/mcag314
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcag314
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.