Information Leakage in Enzyme Substrate Prediction

Clicks: 91
ID: 330878
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #127 of 983 articles by views in BMC Bioinformatics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 983 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Enzymes are essential catalysts in many cellular processes. Understanding their interactions with small molecules, such as regulators, cofactors, and most importantly, substrates, is crucial for understanding the biochemical processes that occur in cells. Correctly interpreting the roles of small molecules that interact with enzymes is key to elucidating enzyme function. Recently, enzyme-small molecule interaction prediction has attracted growing interest from computational methods, especially deep learning. As a result, researchers have published several datasets and numerous models with remarkable performance. RESULTS: In this work, we critically examine one of the most popular datasets and four models trained on it, identifying similarity-induced information leakage that may overinflate reported model performance in out-of-distribution applications. We show that the inspected models are susceptible to information leakage, and their performance is not better than statistical baselines when the leakage is removed. Furthermore, controlling for leakage due to protein sequence similarity alone still yields high predictive performance, whereas performance decreases substantially when common substrates shared between training and test sets are removed from one of them, and approaches random prediction when structurally similar ligands are separated between splits. Thus, the investigated models generalize considerably better across enzyme sequence space than across ligand chemical space, indicating that their reported performance depends strongly on the small-molecule similarity between training and evaluation data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All data splits we calculated in this study are available on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18786394). The code is available on GitHub and backed up on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18788609). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary information is available at Bioinformatics online.
Reference Key
openalex_W7133224733 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Vahid Atabaigi Elmi, Roman Joeres, Olga V. Kalinina
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal BMC Bioinformatics
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/bioinformatics/btag733
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btag733
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.