Postoperative Physical Therapy After Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Clicks: 10
ID: 330858
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #99 of 113 articles by views in Aesthetic surgery journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Postoperative physical therapy (PT) is well established after mastectomy to reduce upper-limb dysfunction, pain, and quality-of-life impairment. However, its role following breast reconstruction remains less clearly defined, largely due to concerns regarding reconstruction-specific complications. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of PT on functional shoulder range of motion (ROM), pain, upper-limb function, and quality of life (QoL) after breast reconstruction. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251025047). PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to July 2025. Eligible studies included adults undergoing implant-based or autologous reconstruction receiving preoperative or postoperative PT interventions. Quality was assessed via RoB 2 and ROBINS-I. Due to heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was conducted. RESULTS: Fifteen studies (n = 1,020) were included. Early and structured physiotherapy consistently improved short-term shoulder ROM, upper-limb function, and quality-of-life outcomes without increasing surgical complications. Initiating rehabilitation within two weeks postoperatively accelerated flexion and abduction recovery compared with traditional four-week immobilization protocols. Functional outcomes varied by reconstruction type, suggesting differing rehabilitation needs following implant-based versus autologous procedures. Massage-based interventions showed limited additional benefit from adjunctive therapies such as acupuncture or meditation. Evidence regarding optimal intervention type, delivery mode, and long-term benefit was limited by heterogeneity and variable study quality. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative PT is probably associated with earlier functional recovery and does not appear to compromise surgical safety, although certainty in this evidence is low across outcomes. However, the current evidence base is limited. High-quality, powered randomized controlled trials with standardized measures and longer follow-up are necessary to establish definitive clinical guidelines.
Reference Key
openalex_W7218522422 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Sevasti Panagiota Glynou, Annie M. Fritsch, Fedra Britvic, Dimple K Gajjar, Rebecca W. Knackstedt, Tae Woon Chong, George Kokosis
Journal Aesthetic surgery journal
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/asj/sjag211
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjag211
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.