Goals of melanoma surveillance: focusing on outcomes that matter most
Clicks: 2
ID: 330704
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
2 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #366 of 367 articles by views in the british journal of dermatology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 367 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Author’s reply to ‘Low-risk lesion, increased-risk patient: separating lesion prognosis from future melanoma risk’ by Baldao-Simó et al.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (19 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7214965780
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Katy Bell, Adewole S. Adamson, Lisa Parker, Alexander C. J. van Akkooi, David E. Elder, Raymond L. Barnhill, Elspeth Davies, Blake O’Brien, Brooke Nickel |
| Journal | the british journal of dermatology |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/bjd/ljag430
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.