371. The Effects of Yearling Bull Rate of Gain on Fertility and Performance.

Clicks: 1
ID: 330666
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #810 of 816 articles by views in italian journal of animal science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 816 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Bulls represent a significant financial investment in beef cattle operations with their reproductive success being fundamental to herd productivity. Over a three-year study, yearling MARC II bulls [n = 114; 292 ± 30 d of age; BW = 347.64 ± 2.38 kg] were used to determine whether bull rate of gain prior to breeding alters bull reproductive traits at turnout. Bulls had ad libitum access to water and were individually fed the same basal TMR to gain either 1.8 kg/d (HIGH) or 1.13 kg/d (MOD) for 112 days. On d 112 each year, all bulls were subjected to a breeding soundness exam. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedures in SAS with day, treatment, year, and their interactions as fixed effects. Average daily gain was greater (P = 0.04) for HIGH compared with MOD bulls (1.7219 vs. 1.1617 kg/d, respectively) which was divergent in weight by d 14 of the feeding period (P < 0.0001). While HIGH bulls had larger scrotal circumference (P = 0.003) than MOD bulls, there were no treatment × day or main effect of treatment differences in total, motile, or progressive sperm (total or per mL of ejaculate; P ≥ 0.23). A main effect of day was observed (P ≤ 0.014) for ejaculate volume, motile, and progressive sperm, where all increased from d 0 to 112. At the end of the feeding period, there was a treatment × day interaction (P = 0.0183) where circulating concentrations of NEFA were equivalent at d 0, but by d 112, HIGH bulls were lower compared to MOD gain bulls. In contrast to the NEFA data, a treatment × day interaction (P = 0.0294) was detected, where the concentration of glucose in plasma was equivalent on d 0, but by d 112, MOD bulls were lower compared to HIGH gain bulls. The concentrations of glucose (P = 0.32) and NEFA (P = 0.12) in seminal plasma were not affected during the feeding period. Overall, developing bulls at either rate of gain did not negatively affect total sperm production. The increase in scrotal circumference in the HIGH bulls without the concomitant increase in total sperm production suggests increased scrotal fat deposits rather than testicular size. Furthermore, the differences in glucose and NEFA support the increase in body weight and positive energy balance by bulls in the HIGH treatment. These data show no negative effects of developing bulls at either rate of gain on sperm production prior to the breeding season. However, further work should be done to determine the effects of bull management from high concentrate to high forage rations, as is typically seen in production from bull sale to turnout. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214791070 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Kacie L McCarthy, Matthew S Crouse, Jeff Ondrak, Zachary D McFarlane, Carl Robertson R Dahlen, Robert A. Cushman, Alexandria P Snider
Journal italian journal of animal science
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jas/skag272.129
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.