PS10-9. Nutrient Return and Animal Performance from Dairy Heifers Raised in Contrasting Meadow Fescue Grazing Systems.

Clicks: 12
ID: 330621
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #648 of 847 articles by views in italian journal of animal science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 847 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Pasture-based systems can be a win-win strategy for developing dairy heifers. This two-year study (2023–2024) evaluated Holstein heifers grazing meadow fescue (Schedonorus pratensis) pastures under three systems: Meadow Fescue+N fertilizer (MF+N; 157 kg N/ha/yr), Meadow Fescue+Clover (MF+Clover), and non-N fertilized Meadow Fescue (MF). Heifers were managed using rotational stocking. The MF+N pastures had the greatest herbage mass (1,780 kg DM/ha), followed by MF+Clover (1,580 kg DM/ha) and MF (1,430 kg DM/ha; P < 0.001). Forage nutritive value followed a similar trend, with MF+N maintaining the greatest crude protein (CP; 19.1%) and in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD; 65.1%) throughout the season. Heifers grazing MF+N had greater average daily gain (ADG; 0.67 kg/day) than those on MF+Clover (0.56 kg/day) and MF (0.54 kg/day; P = 0.012). Stocking rate (SR) was also greatest in MF+N (4.80 AU/ha; [1 animal unit = 300 kg]), resulting in greater gain per area (GPA; 364 kg/ha) compared to MF+Clover (268 kg/ha) and MF (249 kg/ha; P = 0.001). Dry matter intake (DMI) ranged from 7.3–7.7 kg/day across treatments (P = 0.85), but nitrogen intake and urinary excretion were significantly greater in MF+N due to greater forage CP (P < 0.0001). Enteric methane production did not differ among treatments, averaging 180–183 g CH4/day (P = 0.91). Methane yield per unit of intake was similar (23 g CH4/kg DMI), but MF+N had lower enteric methane production per unit of gain (267 g CH4/kg ADG; P = 0.01), indicating improved methane production efficiency. Overall, MF+N systems enhanced productivity, nutrient cycling, and methane efficiency, while MF+Clover offered moderate improvements over unfertilized pasture. Clover establishment was challenging in MF+Clover, therefore improved clover establishment strategies for grass-legume systems are warranted.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214782855 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors David Jaramillo, Lais Lima, Lisa M. Bauman
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal italian journal of animal science
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jas/skag272.478
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag272.478
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.