242. Behavioral and Physiological Indicators of Litter Outcome in Gestating Gilts.

Clicks: 12
ID: 330610
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #643 of 847 articles by views in italian journal of animal science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 847 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract With rapid development and integration of precision technologies on swine farms, research is needed to identify behavioral indicators of productivity to inform these technologies and translate data into management recommendations. Biological relevance of postural behaviors that are common in automated identification and tracking is largely unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate salivary biomarkers and postural behavior in gestating gilts as potential indicators of farrowing outcomes. To achieve this, 16 gilts were housed in 4 pens of free-access stalls (n = 4/pen). Gilts were unlocked from the stalls, initiating social mixing, at 30 days of gestation (dg) and maintained as stable groups for the remaining gestational period. Saliva was collected by allowing the gilts to passively chew on ropes at 30 and 90 dg. Overhead, continuous video was recorded from 12:00 – 20:00 h at 30 and 90 dg. Recorded video was manually decoded for gilt location (pen, stall) and posture using instantaneous scans at 1 min intervals for a total of 480 scans per timepoint and 960 scans overall. Salivary cortisol, testosterone, and progesterone were quantified using commercially available ELISA kits. Farrowing outcomes recorded for each litter included total number born (TNB), number born alive (NBA), stillbirths, mummies, overlays, litter birth weight (LBW), average birth weight, birth weight standard deviation as a measure of piglet uniformity, number weaned, and litter wean weight (LWW). Greater kneeling behavior at 30 dg was significantly correlated with incidence of farrowing mummies (R = 0.75, P = 0.008, FDR = 0.012). At 90 dg, kneeling behavior was positively correlated with overlaying (R = 0.70, P = 0.005, FDR = 0.069). Sitting behavior at 90 dg was positively correlated with farrowing mummies and negatively correlated with number weaned (R = 0.74, P = 0.002, FDR = 0.042; R = -0.77, P = 0.001, FDR = 0.030, respectively). Each of these relationships remained significant after correcting for TNB. Gilts that spent more time lying sternal as opposed to lateral at 30 dg had less uniform piglets (R = 0.70, P = 0.008, FDR = 0.069). Similarly, sternal lying at 90 dg was negatively correlated with number weaned and LWW (R = -0.74, P = 0.002, FDR = 0.042; R = -0.72, P = 0.004, FDR = 0.063, respectively). There were no correlations detected between postural behaviors and salivary biomarkers, or between salivary biomarkers and farrowing outcomes. Nonetheless, these data suggest that kneeling and sitting behavior in gestating gilts are promising behavioral indicators of at-risk litters, and excessive sternal lying may be indicative of gilts that will be poor producers. As technology is already able to detect and differentiate between postural behaviors, this data provides insights for development of future precision tools for management and gilt selection.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214780510 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Andrea M Luttman, Nancy E. Raney, Catherine W. Ernst
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal italian journal of animal science
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jas/skag272.314
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag272.314
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.