248. Utilization of Enrichment Blocks in Group-Housed Sows Under Commercial Conditions: Effects on Aggressive Interactions and Sow And Litter Performance.

Clicks: 12
ID: 330557
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #427 of 847 articles by views in italian journal of animal science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 847 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Group-housing sows during gestation is becoming more prevalent in the swine industry. However, this housing strategy may increase aggressive interactions thereby increasing injuries and reducing farrowing performance. Therefore, the study objective was to determine whether provision of environmental enrichment during late gestation would reduce aggressive interactions resulting in reduced physiological stress and improved sow and piglet performance under commercial production conditions. We hypothesized that environmental enrichment would reduce aggressive interactions thereby reducing physiological stress and improving overall sows and piglet performance. Gestating sows (N = 960; parity = 3.36 ± 0.61) were randomly assigned to control (CON) pens with no enrichment (n = 9 pens; 53.2 ± 2.2 sows/pen) or pens containing three molasses and beet pulp-based enrichment blocks (BLK; n = 9 pens; 53.4 ± 1.1 sows/pen). Body weights were collected for all sows on gestation d 103.0 ± 1.1 and as sows entered farrowing on gestation d 110.7 ± 1.1 and feed intake was assessed daily. Sows were video recorded in 2-h intervals across a 12-h period on d 3 and 5 following treatment administration to assess feeder based, non-feeder based, and total number of aggressive interactions per h within each pen. Saliva samples were collected on d 3 and 5 post-treatment administration on one focal sow within the pen to assess salivary cortisol. One d prior to weaning, two piglets representing the mean litter weight of focal sow litters (n = 1 barrow and 1 gilt) were subjected to a stress test followed by blood collection to assess plasma cortisol concentrations and hair samples were collected to determine hair cortisol concentrations. Litter characteristics including total born, live born, mummies, stillborn, and number weaned were recorded on all litters. Pen was considered the experimental unit for all measures. Aggressive interactions were reduced (P = 0.03) in BLK (12.54 ± 2.42 interactions/h) versus CON (14.99 ± 2.55 interactions/h) pens. Regardless of treatment, feeder-based, non-feeder-based, and total aggressive interactions were greater (P < 0.01; 13.7, 6.2, and 17.1%, respectively) on d 3 versus 5 and declined (P < 0.01; 85.7%) from 0100-0300 h to 2100-2300 h. No differences (P > 0.10) in sow average daily gain (0.96 ± 0.07 kg/d), feed intake (2.24 ± 0.05 kg/d), sow salivary cortisol concentrations (7.45 ± 1.34 ng/mL), piglet hair cortisol concentrations (7.21 ± 0.98 pg/mg), piglet plasma cortisol concentrations (43.42 ± 5.19 ng/mL), total born (17.5 ± 0.19 piglets), live born (15.19 ± 0.18 piglets), stillborn (1.81 ± 0.14 piglets), mummies (0.44 ± 0.04 piglets), or number weaned (12.29 ± 0.17 piglets) were observed. Overall, the provision of environmental enrichment during late gestation reduced aggressive interactions but did not affect sow and litter physiological stress biomarkers or performance under commercial conditions.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214772618 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Carley R Hopkins, Cooper T McAuley, Katelyn N. Gaffield, Jason C Woodworth, Juan F Castillo Zuniga, Clayton S Chastain, Joel M DeRouchey, Shelby L Diggs, Jordan T Gebhardt, Robert D Goodband, Eric Parr, Nicholas J Prosek, Caitlyn R Sullivan, Mike D Tokach, Jay Steven Johnson
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal italian journal of animal science
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jas/skag272.318
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag272.318
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.