The Effect of Increasing Inclusion Level of Different Rumen Buffers or Alkalizing Agents on in vitro Fermentation Outcomes When Added to a Low-roughage Diet for Finishing Beef Cattle.

Clicks: 12
ID: 330548
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #423 of 847 articles by views in italian journal of animal science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 847 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Reducing the beef industry’s contribution to methane (CH4) emissions represents an opportunity to mitigate environmental impacts while enhancing production efficiency. Buffers and alkalinizing compounds alter ruminal conditions, which influences hydrogen availability and may inhibit methanogenesis. Four independent completely randomized design experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of increasing dietary inclusion of limestone, sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), potassium carbonate (K2CO3), or urea on in vitro fermentation outcomes when replacing steam-flaked corn in a low-roughage [8% of diet dry matter (DM)] finishing diet. Treatments included (DM basis) either 0, 1, or 2% NaHCO3, K2CO3, or urea while limestone inclusions were 0, 1.5, and 3%. Duplicated ground diet samples were weighed into fiber filter bags and randomly assigned to 1 of 36 incubation jars fitted with a gas collection bag (n = 12/treatment). Jars contained buffered rumen fluid and were incubated at 39 °C for 48 h. Gas samples were analyzed for CH4 concentration. Rumen fluid samples were analyzed for volatile fatty acid (VFA) and ammonia concentrations. Data were analyzed using a general linear model [jar = experimental unit; treatment = fixed effect; 0-h gas production (GP) and total sample weight = covariates]. Orthogonal contrasts were used to evaluate linear and quadratic treatment effects. Significance was declared at P ≤ 0.05 and tendencies declared when 0.05 < P ≤ 0.15. Gas production at 48 h was unaffected by limestone, NaHCO3, or urea (P ≥ 0.29), but increasing K2CO3 tended to affect 48-h GP (positive quadratic; P = 0.06). Limestone, NaHCO3, or urea did not affect CH4 measurements (P ≥ 0.17). Increasing K2CO3 affected %CH4 and CH4 yield (positive quadratic; P ≤ 0.01). Digestibility was unaffected by NaHCO3 (P ≥ 0.43) Increasing K2CO3 linearly decreased in vitro DM digestibility (IVDMD) and true DM digestibility (TDMD; P ≤ 0.01). Increasing urea affected IVDMD and TDMD (negative quadratic; P = 0.05). Limestone did not affect IVDMD (P = 1.00), but linearly increased TDMD (P < 0.01). Final pH linearly increased with increasing limestone, NaHCO3, K2CO3, or urea (P ≤ 0.02). Limestone, NaHCO3, or K2CO3 did not affect total or individual VFA concentrations (P ≥ 0.18). Increasing urea linearly increased butyrate (P = 0.02) and linearly decreased valerate (P < 0.01), but no other VFA concentrations (P ≥ 0.16). Ammonia concentration was linearly decreased by increasing NaHCO3 (P < 0.01), linearly increased by increasing urea (P < 0.01), affected by increasing limestone (positive quadratic; P = 0.02), and tended to be affected by increasing K2CO3 (positive quadratic; P = 0.10). Results indicate addition of buffers or alkalizing compounds to finishing beef cattle diets have little effect on in vitro CH4 production but may alter rumen fermentation outcomes related to live animal performance or rumen health.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214771169 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal italian journal of animal science
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jas/skag272.293
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.