PS13-15. Evaluation of ANKOM F57 and F58 Filter Bags for In-Vitro Digestibility Across Different Incubation Timepoints.

Clicks: 15
ID: 330538
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #327 of 847 articles by views in italian journal of animal science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 847 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract The use of filter bags is a critical component of in-vitro forage digestibility procedures, with two filter bag types (F57 and F58) currently available for use. To date, most published evaluations using these filter bags in an ANKOM Daisy Incubator focus on cool-season forages, with limited research addressing warm-season forages and grass-legume mixtures typical of the southern United States. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare in-vitro digestibility of three forage sources (alfalfa, bermudagrass, and an alfalfa-bermudagrass mixture) at three different digestibility timepoints (0, 24, and 48 hours) using two different filter bags (F57 and F58). Data were analyzed using SAS 9.4 in a randomized complete block design with a 2 x 3 factorial arrangement. Results indicated differences between filter bag type among forage types across incubation timepoints (p < 0.01). However, digestibility values for treatments containing bermudagrass did not differ between F57 and F58 filter bags at the 48-hour timepoint (p > 0.05). These preliminary findings suggest that filter bag type may not influence in-vitro digestibility estimates for bermudagrass-containing samples under the conditions evaluated. Additional research is warranted utilizing a broader range of warm-season forages and mixtures.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214770155 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal italian journal of animal science
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jas/skag272.593
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.