299. Microbiome Analysis as a Tool to Investigate Gut Health: Methodological Considerations.

Clicks: 15
ID: 330510
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #324 of 847 articles by views in italian journal of animal science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 847 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Molecular tools are used to assess intestinal microbiota, with next-generation sequencing (16S rRNA gene or DNA shotgun sequencing) being the most applied methods in research. These untargeted methods are particularly useful for discovering new bacterial taxa and identifying broad microbial changes associated with disease or nutritional interventions. However, they have significant limitations: major challenges include the lack of standardization and the high variability between laboratories, as differences in DNA extraction, choice of PCR primers, statistical models, and bioinformatics pipelines (ie, databases) all influence the results. Consequently, even when analyzing the same dataset, different laboratories report different findings. This contributes to the variability observed across studies, even when similar diets or health conditions are examined. A major limitation is that sequencing data are reported as relative abundances rather than absolute quantities. Because each taxon is expressed as a proportion of the total sequences, an increase in one bacterial taxon will automatically appear as a decrease in others, even if their actual levels remain unchanged. For example, if Streptococcus increases in response to a dietary change, other taxa may be reduced simply due to this proportional shift, not because they truly declined. As a result, reporting data as relative percentages leads to inaccurate quantification of microbiome changes. Additionally, sequencing methods generally have lower analytical sensitivity, meaning some important bacteria remain undetected. In contrast, targeted quantitative PCR (qPCR) offers higher sensitivity and reproducibility, allowing for more accurate detection of specific taxa. Each bacterial taxon is measured independently, therefore avoiding the pitfalls of compositional data (relative abundance). This allows us to establish reference intervals, and furthermore, because assays are reproducible, to compare data across studies. This presentation will discuss the common methodological pitfalls of microbiome studies, and how evaluation of core bacteria and their functional metabolites using standardized and targeted assays improve the interpretation of microbiome data.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214766148 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jan S. Suchodolski
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal italian journal of animal science
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jas/skag272.088
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag272.088
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.