163. A Preliminary Analysis of Physiological Factors Influencing Fetal Development in Gilts Exposed to Varying Heat Stress Intensities During Early and Late Gestation.

Clicks: 12
ID: 330477
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #407 of 847 articles by views in italian journal of animal science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 847 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract The study objective was to understand the relationship between the physiological response to gestational heat stress (HS) and measures of sow body condition and fetal development. Twenty-seven nulliparous sows were bred and randomly assigned to early gestation (EG; n = 13; d 0-52 of gestation) or late gestation (LG; n = 14; d 52-105 of gestation) groups. Gilts were assigned to one of four environmental treatments: thermoneutral (TN; n = 7; 17 to 21 °C), mild (MILD; n = 6; 24-26 °C), moderate (MOD; n = 7; 26-32 °C), or severe (SEV; n = 7; 28-36 °C). Respiration rate [RR; breaths per minute (bpm)] was measured daily (0800, 1200, 1600, and 2000 h). Vaginal temperature (Tv) was measured in 15-min intervals using implanted data loggers. Body weight (BW), body condition score (BCS), and back fat depth (BF) were measured weekly. At the conclusion of EG and LG, the reproductive tract, placentas, and fetuses were collected to determine weights, fetal counts and viability, and conceptus loss (corpora lutea-viable fetuses). Data were analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX, with the individual sow or fetus serving as the experimental unit. Pearson’s correlations were done to evaluate associations among sow physiological variables related to sow body condition and fetal development. During EG, RR increased (P < 0.01) in SEV (74±1 bpm) and MOD (75±1 bpm) sows relative to MILD (55±1 bpm) and TN (30±1 bpm) sows but was similar between SEV and MOD sows. In LG, RR was greatest (P < 0.01) in SEV (97±2 bpm), followed by MOD (85±2 bpm), MILD (63±2 bpm), and TN (31±2 bpm) sows. Sow BW in EG was greater (P < 0.01) in SEV (149.05±1.93 kg) and MOD (148.60±1.86 kg) sows versus TN sows (139.95±1.91 kg), but similar between MILD (143.35±2.02 kg), SEV, MOD, and TN sows. Backfat was greater in EG (P < 0.01) for SEV (23.95±0.45 mm) and MOD (23.61±0.37 mm) versus MILD (21.05±0.43 mm) and TN (20.56±0.50 mm) sows, but no differences were observed between SEV and MOD sows. During LG, BF was greater (P < 0.01) in SEV (20.25±0.51 mm) and MOD (19.07±0.58 mm) sows versus TN (17.06±0.50 mm) sows, and greater in SEV versus MILD (17.06±0.50 mm) sows. Viable fetuses were greater (P = 0.02; +2.5 fetuses) in MOD versus SEV and MILD litters in LG. Positive correlations were observed between Tv and BF (P = 0.01; r = 0.67), BCS and conceptus loss (P = 0.01; r = 0.66) in EG sows, and RR and BF (P = 0.04; r = 0.56) in LG sows. Negative correlations were observed between Tv and BW (P = 0.02; r=-0.63), RR and placental weight (P < 0.01; r=-0.73), and BF and fetal weight (P = 0.05; r=-0.54) in LG sows. No differences were observed with any other comparison (P > 0.05). These relationships suggest that increasing heat load may alter partitioning of maternal resources during pregnancy, with implications for fetal development and viability.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214761316 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Lillian Claire Bombeck, Juan F Castillo Zuniga, Amy L Petry, Luiz F. Brito, Jeremy James Cottrell, Carley R Hopkins, Caitlyn R Sullivan, Jay Steven Johnson
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal italian journal of animal science
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jas/skag272.206
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag272.206
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.