41. Comparison of Mineral Tub Supplementation Containing Either Organic-complexed or Inorganic Trace Mineral Sources on Heifer Development and Reproductive Performance.

Clicks: 11
ID: 330446
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #635 of 847 articles by views in italian journal of animal science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 847 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Replacement heifer development programs aim to prepare females for reproductive success by using targeted nutritional and management techniques, such as mineral supplementation. Mineral nutrition, although commonly overlooked, plays a key role in meeting physiological demands, and trace minerals are often provided in different forms, including organic and inorganic sources, to support heifer development. The objective of this study was to compare beef heifer growth and reproductive performance when supplemented with mineral tubs containing organic-complexed or inorganic trace mineral sources offered for ad libitum consumption. Thirty days after weaning, fall-born, commercial Angus heifers (n = 80) were allocated randomly to 1 of 8 pastures based on weaning body weights, birth weight, birth date, and sire. These 8 pastures were then assigned randomly to 1 of 2 treatment groups: 1) supplementation with tubs containing organic-complexed trace minerals (ORG) or 2) supplementation with tubs containing inorganic trace minerals (ING), with both containing similar micromineral concentrations. Mineral tubs and white salt were weighed and placed into pastures on d 0 (May 14, 2025), and mineral intake was determined by measuring tub weights weekly. Growth performance data, including body weight (BW) and body condition score (BCS), were collected monthly. Estrus synchronization for artificial insemination (AI) began on d 187. All heifers were bred to male-sexed semen from a single sire either 12 hours after observation of standing heat or by fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) at 66 hr (d 205). Ten days after FTAI (d 215), heifers were combined into groups (n = 20) within mineral treatment and exposed to 1 fertile bull per pasture. FTAI and overall pregnancy rates were determined by blood analysis (d 238 and d 292). Performance data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure and pregnancy data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure in SAS 9.4. A day effect was observed for BW and BCS (P < 0.0001), indicating that heifers increased in BW and BCS throughout the study, but no differences were detected between treatments (P ≥ 0.2661) or treatment × day interactions (P ≥ 0.9372). There was a treatment × day interaction (P < 0.0001), a main effect of treatment (P = 0.0131), and a day effect (P < 0.0001) for mineral intake. Overall mineral intakes were greater for heifers receiving ORG supplement (290 g/d) in contrast to the heifers on the ING supplement (371 g/d). No differences were detected for AI pregnancy status (P = 0.6557; ORG = 55%, ING = 50%). Additionally, overall pregnancy rates did not differ between treatments (P = 0.4461; ORG = 91%, ING = 88%). In conclusion, trace mineral source affected mineral intake, but did not alter performance or pregnancy outcomes in developing beef heifers.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214755000 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jacy L Riddle, Jeremy G Powell, Charles R. Looney, Elizabeth Backes-Belew, Chris Ashworth, Jason Sewell, Jana L. Reynolds, Alexis J Harness, Robin A Cheek, C R Looney, Elizabeth B. Kegley
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal italian journal of animal science
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jas/skag272.255
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag272.255
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.