200. Drinking Water Quality in Brazilian Feedlots and Implications for Trough Water Sampling Procedures.

Clicks: 13
ID: 330410
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #472 of 847 articles by views in italian journal of animal science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 847 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Feedlot cattle may consume dozens of liters of water daily, particularly in hot climatic conditions. Therefore, assessing the quality of water provided in feedlot operations is essential to avoid compromising animal performance. Thus, this study aimed to assess drinking water quality in Brazilian feedlots and to determine appropriate sampling procedures for trough water. Eighty-one feedlots were visited across five states. Each feedlot was visited once, and one pen receiving a finishing diet was selected. Three water samples were collected: one from the water inlet and two from the surface of the drinking trough, positioned at equidistant points. All samples were collected in 500-mL plastic bottles, refrigerated, and subsequently frozen. Physicochemical properties and mineral elements of the water were assessed (Table 1). A standardized questionnaire was also used to collect information on water source type, trough cleaning frequency, and other management practices. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize water quality parameters using R software. Spatial variability within the trough was assessed using the maximum critical ratio (MCR) between the two sampling sites. Water sources consisted of wells (66%), surface water (28%), or a combination of both (6%). In most feedlots (52%), troughs were cleaned every two days. Regarding water safety guidelines, Mn exceeded the critical threshold (> 0.05 mg/L) in 2.5% of the water inlets, whereas concentrations in the troughs exceeded this limit in 5% of the operations. Similarly, Fe and total hardness exceeded the maximum limits in 1.2% of the trough samples, whereas they were within safe limits at the source. Considering the alert proximity zone (≤ 20% the limit), the proportion of feedlots approaching the Mn threshold increased from 5% at the inlet to 12% in the trough. Regarding spatial variability within the same trough, pH, electrical conductivity, Fe, and Mn showed low variation between samples, whereas SO4, Mg, Ca, Na, color, total hardness, turbidity, and TDS exhibited considerable variability. Source and trough water met literature-reported limits for key cattle water quality parameters in 98% and 94% of operations, respectively; 95% and 88% fell within the attention zone (≤ 20% the limit). When monitoring water quality, Mn and Fe should be prioritized, as they are most often associated with organoleptic issues. Sampling protocols should include both inlet and trough water. Due to spatial variability within troughs, single-point sampling is inadequate; composite samples are required to represent the water consumed by the herd. For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214749841 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Paulo Damasceno, Rafaella Prado, Valter Bonamichi, Samara Cunha, Thiago Fernandes Bernardes
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal italian journal of animal science
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jas/skag272.054
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag272.054
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.