PS2-26. Intestinal and Total Track Organic Matter Digestion of Newly Developed Value-added Blended Fat Stimulated Feed Product in Ruminants in Comparison with Commercial Protein and Energy Feeds.

Clicks: 12
ID: 330352
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #529 of 847 articles by views in italian journal of animal science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 847 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract The objectives of this study were to compare commercial protein and energy products with the newly developed value-added blended fat stimulated feed product (BFSFP) on intestinal and total track organic matter digestion in ruminants. Three-batches samples of the newly developed value-added blended fat stimulated feed products BFSFP1, BFSFP2 and BFSFP3 were developed. The only difference among the three BFSFP tested was batch. Three samples of barley grain (n = 3) and canola meal (n = 3) were obtained from Canadian Feed Research Center (CFRC, University of Saskatchewan, Canada). Intestinal and total track organic matter digestion in lactating dairy cattle were determined using three-step approach. The treatment design was a one-way structure with three feed treatment levels (i = 1 (BFSFP), 2 (Barley), 3 (canola meal). The experimental design was a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with the feed treatments as a fixed effect (i = 1 (BFSFP, n = 3), 2 (Barley, n = 3), 3 (canola meal, n = 3) and the experimental runs as a random block effect. The results showed that compared with commercially available energy-rich and protein-rich feeds, the newly developed BFSFP was lower in the intestinal digestibility of rumen bypass OM (%dBOM) than protein rich feed of canola meal and but higher than energy rich feed of barley grain (53.0% vs. 60.0% vs. 44.5%, P < 0.01). It also had higher the intestinal digestible rumen bypass OM content (IDBOM) than barley grain (227 vs. 173 g/kg DM, P < 0.01) but higher than the protein rich feed of canola meal (256 g/kg DM). For total tract digestible OM (TDOM in g/kg DM), the newly developed BFSFP was lower (P < 0.01) than canola meal but higher (P < 0.01) than barley grain (738 vs. 757 vs. 763 g/kg DM, respectively). In conclusion, the BFSFP differs in intestinal and total track organic matter digestion compared to the commercially available energy-rich and protein-rich feeds.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214739988 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors U Ihsan, L L Prates, M R Espinosa, P Yu
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal italian journal of animal science
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jas/skag272.607
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag272.607
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.