82. Fifty Years of Progress for Beef Cattle Production in the United States.

Clicks: 10
ID: 330348
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #799 of 847 articles by views in italian journal of animal science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 847 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Many changes in feed production and the maintenance and genetics of cattle have occurred over the past 50 years which affect the efficiency, productivity and environmental impacts of beef cattle production. Trends in feed and animal productivity were determined through regression of historical annual data with time. The Integrated Farm System Model, following life cycle assessment procedures, was used to assess the impact of these changes by modeling representative cattle operations throughout the US in 1972 and 2022. Improvements in yields of feed crops, animal maintenance and genetics, machinery efficiency, and the production of resources such as fuel, electricity, and fertilizer have led to many reductions in the life cycle environmental impacts of beef cattle production. Fewer but larger cattle harvested in 2022 produced 23% more beef carcass weight than in 1972. Nearly the same total feed was consumed to produce beef in 2022 as used in 1972, but about 9% less forage and 43% more grain and other concentrate feeds were fed. Increases in crop yields, particularly corn yields, led to a 12% reduction in cropland and 11% reduction in total land use over the 50-yr period. Other predicted improvements included a 25% reduction in blue water use, 23% reduction in fossil energy use, and 6% reduction in methane emissions. There was little change in total reactive N losses related to beef cattle production with a 34% increase in ammonia emissions offset by decreases in N denitrification, leaching and runoff losses. Considering the increase in animal weight produced, reductions per unit of carcass weight included 21% less feed, 29% less land, 41% less blue water, 39% less fossil energy, 26% less methane, and 19% less reactive N loss. A sensitivity analysis showed that these results were not influenced much by changes in our assumptions on past animal and pasture management. These improvements reflect the continuing trend of the U.S. beef industry to increase productivity and efficiency for a more sustainable product to meet the growing demand for beef.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214739382 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Clarence Alan Rotz, Jose Castano-Sanchez, D.M. Kniffen, Matt Buyers, Samantha J. Werth
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal italian journal of animal science
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jas/skag272.230
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag272.230
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.