26. Assessing Priority Needs of Small-scale Livestock Producers in Utah: Implications for Extension Programming and Policies.

Clicks: 10
ID: 330219
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #781 of 847 articles by views in italian journal of animal science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 847 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Small-scale, backyard, and hobby livestock systems are expanding across the western United States, yet Utah-specific, producer-driven assessments integrating infrastructure, animal health, business capacity, and Extension engagement remain limited. A statewide cross-sectional needs assessment survey was conducted across all 29 Utah counties from January 2025 to January 2026 to identify priority needs among small-scale livestock producers (n = 114). The study examines demographics, production characteristics, priority challenges, and preferred Extension engagement methods. Using simple percentages, Rank Discrepancy Scores (RDS), gap (G), and principal component analysis (PCA) all 23 issues were evaluated. Results showed that respondents were predominantly female (68%). Racial composition of the sample was largely homogeneous, with most respondents identifying as White (79%), many ethnic respondents identified as not Hispanic or Latino (89%), with most producers managing fewer than 20 animals (45%) and operating for 10 years or less (69%). Livestock ownership was primarily hobby-based (49%) or supplemental income oriented (25%). Using Rank Discrepancy Scores (RDS), gap analysis (G), and principal component analysis (PCA), all 23 evaluated issues exhibited negative RDS values, indicating widespread unmet needs. Water accessibility emerged as the highest priority with RDS, - 47; mean importance score (MIS), 4.23; mean access score (MAS), 3.44; and G, 0.79, followed by parasite and disease management (RDS, - 40; G, 0.76), feed management (RDS, - 38; G, 0.70), and financial resources and capital (RDS, - 36; G, 0.85). PCA (KMO = 0.87; Bartlett’s p < 0.001) identified three domains explaining 59.27% of total variance: these three domains are: Production Infrastructure and Environmental Resources (RDS, - 30), Livestock Health and Husbandry Practices (RDS, -25), and Farm Business and Marketing (RDS, - 23). Extension engagement preferences indicated strong demand for digital information delivery, with 59% preferring web-based platforms and 49% email communication. Hybrid training formats were most favored, including face-to-face workshops with online components (39%) and primarily online training with some in-person interaction (29%). These findings highlight key needs among Utah livestock producers, including water access, livestock health management, feed management, and infrastructure. The greatest gaps exist between the importance of these needs and producers’ access to resources. Extension-led interventions using blended educational approaches can improve animal welfare, strengthen producer capacity, and promote sustainable small-scale livestock systems in the state. For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text. For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text. For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text. For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text. For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text. For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text. For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text. For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214720517 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Joseph J Okoh, Lendel Kade Narine, Andree Walker-Bravo, Chad M Page
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal italian journal of animal science
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jas/skag272.111
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag272.111
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.