Clinical Pharmacy Services among Veterans with Chronic Kidney Disease: Associations with Rural Residence and Primary Care Setting

Clicks: 18
ID: 330034
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #132 of 247 articles by views in American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 247 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare clinical pharmacist practitioner (CPP) service receipt among Veterans with chronic kidney disease (CKD) by rural/urban residence and by primary care site, and to describe CPP telehealth use. METHODS: Using Veterans Health Administration data, we identified Veterans with CKD (N=699,273), defined by two eGFR values <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (≥90 days apart) and ≥1 primary care visit in 2019. Rurality was based on Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes. The primary outcome was ≥1 outpatient CPP encounter; secondary outcomes were CPP encounter frequency and telehealth use. We used multivariable logistic regression with a random intercept for health system. FINDINGS: Overall, 18% of urban and 17% of rural Veterans had ≥1 CPP encounter. After adjustment, rural Veterans were slightly more likely to have a CPP encounter (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.07). Differences were larger by primary care site: 21% at medical centers, 16% at urban clinics (aOR 0.69; 95% CI 0.68-0.70) and 14% at rural clinics (aOR 0.61; 95% CI 0.59-0.62). Among Veterans with ≥1 CPP encounter (n=124,490, 17.8%), rural Veterans had slightly more CPP encounters than urban Veterans (4.6 vs 4.3). CPP telehealth comprised 53.7% of encounters and varied by primary care site (56.5% medical centers, 48.8% urban clinics, 62.8% rural clinics). CONCLUSIONS: Rural-urban differences in CPP receipt were small after adjustment, but Veterans receiving primary care in community clinics had lower CPP receipt than those at medical centers. Telehealth may support expanded CPP access for Veterans with CKD.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214586524 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ajhp/zxag301
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.