Stem cell morphology defines functional heterogeneity and therapeutic vulnerabilities in glioblastoma

Clicks: 15
ID: 330020
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #259 of 287 articles by views in journal of neuro-oncology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 287 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumor and an unmet clinical need due to its invasiveness and therapy resistance. These features are driven by glioblastoma stem-like cells (GSLCs), which exhibit remarkable functional heterogeneity. While transcriptional profiling has helped define this heterogeneity, it alone does not fully predict cellular behaviors. Because cell morphology is closely linked to function during neurodevelopment, we asked whether integrating morphological and transcriptomic identities could reveal clinically relevant roles of GSLCs. METHODS: We employed CellShape-seq, a customised spatial transcriptomics platform integrating cell morphology with transcriptome and applied it to patient-derived GBM organoids. To link GSLC transcriptome to function, we combined assembloid invasion assays, calcium imaging, pharmacological perturbations and time-lapse microscopy. RESULTS: We identified three GSLC morphological classes corresponding to distinct transcriptomic states and functional behaviors: nonpolar cells, which show differentiation and therapy sensitivity; elongated cells, which are blood-vessel associated, invasive and chemoresistant; and multipolar cells, which form intercellular networks conveying therapy resistance. Importantly, morphological state remains stable throughout interphase and is readily inherited from mother to daughter cells. However, under pharmacological stress GSLCs show striking morphological plasticity. Namely, Temozolomide treatment is associated with GSLC elongation and branching, while YAP inhibition and gap-junction blockage result in a reduction of elongated and multipolar GSLCs, respectively. Finally, combined targeting of these morphoclass-specific vulnerabilities reduces viability in patient-derived organoids. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that cell morphology provides critical insights into GSLC behaviors and establish a rationale for putative morphology-informed therapies to overcome resistance and improve outcomes in GBM.
Reference Key
openalex_W4408804447 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal journal of neuro-oncology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/neuonc/noag235
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.