Environmental Epidemiology in Military Populations: Summary and Conclusions of the First Military Environmental Epidemiology Symposium

Clicks: 3
ID: 329907
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #77 of 78 articles by views in Military Medicine

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Introduction On April 22, 2025, researchers from the Department of Defense (DoD) (currently referred to as Department of War [DoW]), Department of Veterans Affairs, National Institutes of Health, and other institutions convened for the inaugural Military Environmental Epidemiology Symposium (MEES) at the Uniformed Services University in Bethesda, Maryland. Materials and Methods Leading experts explored the state of research, including research resources and infrastructure, and identified critical challenges, future opportunities, and strategies for advancing the field. Results Presentations highlighted contributions from ongoing large-scale studies, that is, the Millennium Cohort Study and the Million Veterans Program, and case-control studies nested in the DoD Serum Repository (DoDSR) cohort to understanding long-term health impacts of military service and environmental exposures. Valuable sources of data and biospecimens, such as the Defense Medical Surveillance System, Military Health System Data Repository, DoDSR, and Boston Biorepository, Recruitment and Integrated Network for Gulf War Illness (BBRAIN) were described. Exposure assessment methods, ranging from measuring key toxins and multi-omics in DoDSR serum samples to utilizing of military occupational coding, were discussed. Key exposure research areas highlighted were burn pits, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, jet fuels, Gulf War exposures, and occupational hazards. The MEES focused on identifying critical challenges in the field, such as exposure data limitations, biospecimen and data access/sharing difficulties, data quality concerns, and the complexity of military exposures. Conclusions Recommendations for future research strategies emphasized leveraging existing data and biospecimen resources, capitalizing on multi-omics technologies, advancing military exposure assessment, fostering cross-institutional collaborations, and applying new analytical tools.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214466314 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jennifer A. Rusiecki, Jordan McAdam, Mark P. Purdue, Aaron Schneiderman, Celia Byrne, Elizabeth R. Heitz, Rudolph P. Rull, Matthew Ryan Smith, Shauna L. Stahlman, Kimberly A. Sullivan
Journal Military Medicine
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/milmed/usag407
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usag407
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.