Perspectives of consumer involvement in pre-clinical musculoskeletal research: a cross-sectional survey of consumers and community members

Clicks: 18
ID: 329886
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #55 of 77 articles by views in Rheumatology Advances in Practice

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Objectives To examine how consumers are involved in pre-clinical musculoskeletal research and explore their perspectives on involvement. Methods A cross-sectional online survey was conducted to explore consumer involvement in pre-clinical musculoskeletal research and perspectives on involvement. Eligible participants were individuals with lived experience of musculoskeletal conditions or their carers, recruited via consumer networks in Australia and New Zealand. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected using structured and open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics and inductive content analysis were used to analyse responses. Results 166 participants (n = 150 consumers, n = 16 carers) with lived experience of a musculoskeletal condition completed the survey. Forty percent of participants had prior involvement in pre-clinical research, primarily as study participants. Most consumers (77%) believed their involvement should be a requirement and identified clear expectations (96%), training (67%), reimbursement (61%) and buddying with researchers (60%) as essential supports. Almost one third (32%) reported that the support required would vary depending on their role. Consumers rated their input as very important for identifying research priorities (64%) and ensuring research is clinically relevant (59%). Almost 40% did not agree that they lacked necessary training to contribute to pre-clinical research, and showed little interest in applying for research funding (50%), recruiting participants (38%) or writing/reviewing publications (36%). Those with prior research experience reported greater confidence in their skills and their input’s relevance. Conclusion Consumers are willing and perceive that they can contribute meaningfully to pre-clinical research when appropriately supported. Aligning involvement opportunities with consumer interests and providing tailored support ensures impactful partnerships.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214427876 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Megan Heather Ross, Camille Maeva Thomas, Bec Jenkinson, Emmah Doig, Christopher B. Little, Annette (Annie) McPherson, Christine Beanland, Paul W. Hodges, Shireen Lamande, Zsolt Balogh, Ranjeny Thomas, Ashvin Thambyah, Elizabeth Clarke, Daniel Cury Ribeiro, Natalie Sims, Sean Yan
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Rheumatology Advances in Practice
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/rap/rkag115
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkag115
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.