Known QAC determinants outperform genome language model embeddings in a leakage-aware public Listeria benzalkonium chloride tolerance benchmark

Clicks: 20
ID: 329876
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #189 of 241 articles by views in FEMS microbiology letters

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 241 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Whole-genome sequencing and pretrained DNA models may help prioritize disinfectant-tolerance hypotheses, but phenotype prediction requires measured, isolate-linked labels and evaluation that keeps related lineages apart. We compared conventional sequence features, numerical DNA representations generated by DNABERT2, and known quaternary ammonium compound (QAC) determinants in a public benchmark of 197 Listeria monocytogenes isolates with benzalkonium chloride MIC data. Models were evaluated across five repeated lineage-grouped train, development, and test splits. The known-QAC determinant rule showed the highest balanced accuracy (mean ± SD, 0.961 ± 0.057) and ROC AUC (0.961 ± 0.057). A model combining k-mer, DNABERT2, and QAC scores reached balanced accuracy 0.915 ± 0.023, whereas the best DNABERT2-based classifier reached 0.570 ± 0.110; sparse k-mer models did not exceed the dummy baseline. Public non-Listeria studies lacked the row-level phenotype-genome linkage required for supervised modelling. An exploratory bioinformatic screen therefore identified only candidate regions for future testing, not validated tolerance predictions. Because the benchmark contained only 197 publicly linkable isolates, these findings are hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in larger, independent phenotype-linked cohorts. Within these limits, interpretable determinants were the primary validated signal and DNA-model scores were secondary evidence.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214497138 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal FEMS microbiology letters
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/femsle/fnag112
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.