Empirical estimation of asteroid diameters using photopolarimetric observables

Clicks: 17
ID: 329406
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #702 of 1,339 articles by views in monthly notices of the royal astronomical society

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,339 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Asteroid diameters are physical parameters for understanding the size distribution, collisional evolution, and surface properties of minor planets. Existing polarimetric approaches estimate diameters indirectly through albedo determination, propagating uncertainties from intermediate calibrations. Here we derive direct empirical relationships between asteroid diameter (D), absolute magnitude (HV), and two polarimetric observables: the absolute minimum polarization (|Pmin|) and the polarimetric slope (h). Using a calibration sample of 98 asteroids with reliable diameters from thermal-infrared, occultation, and radar measurements, we derive two empirical relations using orthogonal distance regression (ODR), which accounts for uncertainties in both dependent and independent variables. The relations achieve coefficients of determination of R2 = 0.921 (N = 98) and R2 = 0.950 (N = 82) for |Pmin|- and h-based formulations. Leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) yields cross-validated coefficients of $R^2_{\rm CV}=0.910$ and 0.947, with median fractional errors of 14.00% and 11.99%, demonstrating predictive capability for excluded asteroids. Validation against radar-, occultation-, and NEOWISE-derived diameters confirms consistency for most moderate- to low-albedo main-belt asteroids below ~523 km. The relations provide a convenient operational alternative for estimating asteroid diameters directly from polarimetric data and HV, avoiding the need to separately catalogue or re-derive albedo values whenever photometric compilations are updated. Comparison with reference geometric albedos shows larger scatter than the diameter comparison (RMS fractional residuals of 36–44 per cent), consistent with error amplification in the diameter-to-albedo conversion; nonetheless, a binary dark/bright classification test (pV = 0.12 boundary) achieves 96.9 and 93.9 per cent accuracy, demonstrating strong discriminating power for broad reflectance class despite noisier continuous albedo recovery.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214005294 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal monthly notices of the royal astronomical society
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/mnras/stag1781
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.