Sustainable quality improvement interventions to ensure adequate documentation of chaperone presence in breast clinic: A multi-cycle clinical audit
Clicks: 6
ID: 329356
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
1.5
/100
6 views
5 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #131 of 144 articles by views in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 144 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Current best practice guidelines recommend chaperone presence during intimate clinical examination. Achieving guideline standards of documentation regarding chaperone presence has important implications from both clinical governance and medicolegal perspectives. This multi-cycle clinical audit provides insight into quality improvement interventions relevant to chaperone utilisation and achieving guideline documentation standards. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-centre, multi-cycle quality improvement audit was performed in the setting of a tertiary breast referral clinic at Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. The quality improvement audit consisted of three audit cycles with two distinct interventions employed. Firstly, a 'chaperone stamp' was entered into the clinical notes prior to consultation to serve as a memory aid for physicians. Secondly, following transfer of clinical notes from paper-based to electronic records, a mandatory check field was introduced ensuring adequate documentation. RESULTS: A total of 388 female patients underwent breast examination at our centre. Despite levels of chaperone presence being directly observed at 100% in clinical consultations, chaperone documentation rates were poor (7.6%). Introduction of a chaperone stamp resulted in a 51.1% improvement in chaperone documentation. This intervention demonstrated poor sustainability as documentation standards declined by 13.6% at six months post-intervention. Introduction of a mandatory check field using electronic patient records generated the most significant improvement in documentation standards, with 100% of clinical notes recording chaperone presence to reference standard. CONCLUSION: Accurate documentation of chaperone presence or decline thereof is of relevance from clinical governance and medicolegal perspectives. Simple, resource efficient, interventions such as the 'chaperone stamp' demonstrate significant quality improvement potential but with questionable long-term efficacy. Electronic records present a viable opportunity for units to achieve guideline standards in a time and resource efficient manner.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7213949408
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Cian M. Hehir, Gavin G. Calpin, Nadia Walsh, Gordon R Daly, Gavin Paul Dowling, Sandra Hembrecht, Katie Kearns, Michael Allen, Abeeda Butt, Colm Power, A. Hill |
| Journal | International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/intqhc/mzag141
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.