Ideological approaches to language socialization

Clicks: 8
ID: 329239
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #1,602 of 1,650 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,650 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract In this chapter, we offer an account of the history, stakes, and possibilities of a concept that has long been a part of the language socialization tradition, even if it has rarely been at its center: beliefs or ideologies that take as their object the process of socialization itself (i.e., “ethnodevelopmental” beliefs). We show how two major approaches in language socialization—peer language socialization and the “classic” approach to language socialization (as exemplified by Ochs 1988 and Schieffelin 1990)—address this issue in ways that simultaneously diminish and provide purchase for language socialization work. In contrast, we develop an approach to these kinds of beliefs or ideologies—framed in our idiom as “ideologies of relative inability”—that maximizes the utility of the concept; we use it to inject a set of sociopolitical concerns directly into the basic machinery of the language socialization paradigm. To do this, we draw on our research on Marshallese children in the US educational system and Peruvian gamers from Indigenous backgrounds.
Reference Key
openalex_W7213969359 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198873174.013.0003
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.