Revisiting Roth’s Paradox of Historical Narratives

Clicks: 12
ID: 329113
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #40 of 54 articles by views in journal of pharmaceutical analysis

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract This paper presents Paul Roth’s Paradox of Historical Narratives and three options: reject the paradox, accept the paradox, or resolve the paradox. I show how the paradox motivates a view called ‘narrativism’ in the philosophy of history, and that narrativists must either accept or resolve the paradox. I argue that narrativists should resolve the paradox.
Reference Key
openalex_W7213559984 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jack Morgan Jones
Journal journal of pharmaceutical analysis
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/analys/anag073
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anag073
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.