Generative AI and a Sceptical Challenge to Digital Testimony
Clicks: 9
ID: 329072
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
2.4
/100
9 views
8 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #50 of 54 articles by views in journal of pharmaceutical analysis
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Generative AI threatens knowledge online not merely by producing falsehoods, but by changing the epistemic environment in which online beliefs are formed. I argue that the spread of convincing AI-generated counterfeits creates a local sceptical challenge to digital testimony. The challenge is not that ordinary subjects must rule out every sceptical possibility. Rather, for many beliefs formed solely from unauthenticated online materials, ordinary subjects are situated among nearby, method-indistinguishable bad cases. In such environments, even true beliefs formed from genuine digital items may fail to satisfy a familiar anti-luck condition on knowledge. This does not show that we never know from online sources. It shows instead that digital-only uptake often falls short of knowledge unless supported by provenance, corroboration, or other independent checks. I close by suggesting that this narrowing of online knowledge may reinforce existing patterns of epistemic injustice.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7213543777
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Ian M. Church |
| Journal | journal of pharmaceutical analysis |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/analys/anag074
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.