Reciprocal error in Time Domain Induced Polarization: Systematic Noise or Systematic Signal?

Clicks: 6
ID: 328885
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #248 of 257 articles by views in geophysical journal international

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 257 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Summary Reciprocal measurements are standard for data quality control in electrical resistivity surveys, but their potential as an interpretation tool is rarely exploited. Under the assumption of linear subsurface behaviour, normal and reciprocal readings should yield the same results, but when a systematic offset is present it can be indicative for additional processes. Here we present a time-domain induced polarization (TDIP) dataset from a volcanic hydrothermal system (Reykjanes, Iceland) where a strong, systematic offset between normal and reciprocal measurements is observed. The discrepancy is present as a positive shift of the reciprocal decay curves (>100 mV/V). While both normal and reciprocal inversions resolve a strong IP anomaly in the southern part of the profile, a substantial offset exists between the two ( >20 mS/m). The offset is spatially confined and persistent over 100 consecutive days, the anomaly itself coincides with a strong IP response attributed to the mutual occurrence of clay minerals and disseminated iron sulphides and oxides. Besides random noise, we evaluate four possible mechanisms for the offset: (1) polarization of the electrodes, (2) inherent sensitivity differences between normal and reciprocal configurations, (3) stray currents from the nearby powerplant and (4) nonlinear IP effects where the response depends on the current density. Given the geological context and the localized nature of anomaly, a non-linear effect is plausible but the ambiguity between systematic noise and a genuine subsurface signal cannot be fully resolved with field data alone. This study demonstrates that the systematic analysis of normal-reciprocal misfit in TDIP can serve as a widely accessible tool for identifying signals that, whether geologic, or anthropogenic in origin, are overlooked by standard data quality workflows.
Reference Key
openalex_W7213271239 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors L Vanhooren, W Deleersnyder, A Flores-Orozco, F Nguyen, C Caudron, T Hermans
Journal geophysical journal international
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/gji/ggag373
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggag373
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.