LMC-induced Perturbations in the Milky Way Halo II: Bridging Field-level Inference and Summary-level Simulation-Based Inference

Clicks: 12
ID: 328875
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #1,160 of 1,339 articles by views in monthly notices of the royal astronomical society

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,339 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract The gravitational interaction between the Milky Way (MW) and the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) drives the outer halo into dynamical disequilibrium, imprinting the masses and structural parameters of both galaxies onto the 6D phase-space distribution of halo tracers. This signal has been characterised with summary statistics ranging from low-order velocity moments to basis function expansions, yet how much information these summaries discard, and whether they are complementary, remains unclear. We address these questions by comparing a likelihood of the halo phase-space distribution (field-level) with physically interpretable summaries for constraining (MMW, MLMC, c, q), where c and q are the MW halo concentration and flattening. A Conditional Flow Matching (CFM) model trained on the HaloDance N-body suite provides an exact likelihood at a held-out fiducial point; for 5,000 tracers in 30–120 kpc it tightens marginal constraints by factors of 2.5–9.9 over an all-sky velocity-moment forecast. To narrow this gap, we construct four parameter-sensitive summaries via BFE+MOPED that capture the angular structure of the halo density and velocity and contain information complementary to the velocity moments. Combining the two sets of summaries tightens the marginal constraints by up to 15 per cent relative to the angular summaries alone, and by 30–71 per cent relative to the velocity moments alone, although the resulting constraints remain 1.3–2.9 times broader than those from the full phase-space benchmark. We thus establish a physically interpretable summary-level route for applying this inference pipeline to future observations, while the field-level benchmark measures the information available for further improvement.
Reference Key
openalex_W7170140347 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal monthly notices of the royal astronomical society
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/mnras/stag1738
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.