Green Rush Conflicts

Clicks: 9
ID: 328634
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #1,586 of 1,787 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,787 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract This chapters argues that the green transition is seeing a multiplication of conflicts around both fossil fuels and ‘green’ minerals and energy projects. A green rush for critical minerals is amplified by the role of critical minerals in economic competitiveness and military technologies, and the merging of the old rhetoric of national security over strategic minerals with that of environmental security over energy transition minerals. Climate extractivism thus fuel many tensions between climate activists, local communities and mining or renewable energy companies, between corporations competing over green markets, and between states defending their interests in relation to the transformative potential of a green transition and military capabilities.
Reference Key
openalex_W7213448908 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/oso/9780197873434.003.0004
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.