Implementing clinician-led sustainability interventions in a tertiary intensive care unit: a quality improvement evaluation

Clicks: 22
ID: 328447
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #92 of 164 articles by views in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 164 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intensive care units are resource-intensive clinical environments with substantial material and environmental impacts. This study evaluated whether clinician-led sustainability interventions implemented through established quality improvement methods could reduce resource use while maintaining explicit safety oversight. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre pre-post quality improvement evaluation in a 34-bed tertiary intensive care unit in Singapore. Following baseline audits, multidisciplinary stakeholder engagement and pragmatic prioritisation, three interventions were implemented: digitisation of clinical competency documentation, stewardship of ventilator circuits during intrahospital transport and replacement of conventional sharps containers with repurposed disinfectant canisters for arterial blood gas syringe disposal. Interventions were refined using Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles; a structured process-redesign framework guided digitisation, and Failure Modes and Effects Analysis informed risk mitigation for ventilator-circuit stewardship. Primary outcomes were changes in material use. Secondary outcomes included estimated environmental and cost impacts, staff acceptability and safety events identified through routine surveillance and incident reporting. RESULTS: Full digitisation eliminated approximately 27,000 paper sheets annually. Ventilator-circuit use decreased by approximately three circuits per intubated admission, equivalent to an annualised reduction of 558 circuits. Repurposed canisters completely replaced 403 conventional sharps containers annually. These changes corresponded to an estimated annual reduction of approximately 866 kg carbon dioxide equivalent. All 21 eligible respiratory therapists completed the circuit-stewardship survey, with favourable ratings for usability, preference and perceived safety. Repurposed canisters were preferred over conventional sharps containers without a significant difference in perceived safety. No adverse events attributable to the revised workflows were detected. CONCLUSION: Clinician-led sustainability interventions integrated into established intensive care unit quality and safety processes were associated with measurable reductions in material use. Multidisciplinary prioritisation, iterative testing and intervention-specific risk assessment provide a transferable approach for implementing sustainability initiatives in critical care.
Reference Key
openalex_W7212375394 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/intqhc/mzag132
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.