What Supports Sustainable Pace in the Operating Room? A Sequential Explanatory Mixed-Methods Study Using Self-Determination Theory

Clicks: 19
ID: 328206
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #109 of 164 articles by views in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 164 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS: Operating-room productivity is commonly pursued through throughput metrics, yet frontline staff point to organisational and interpersonal conditions that make a working pace sustainable. How everyday practices relate to staff motivation, and thereby to dependable workflow, remains underexplored. RESEARCH QUESTION: (1) What organisational and interpersonal conditions support or thwart a sustainable work pace among perioperative nursing staff? (2) How can these conditions be understood through Self-Determination Theory? METHODS: We used a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design at two operating room units in a Swedish university hospital. In Phase 1 the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire-Operating Room version was administered (October 2022; n = 47) to profile contextual contrasts between units. In Phase 2, semi-structured interviews (December 2022 to March 2025; n = 24) were analysed with inductive qualitative content analysis, after which Self-Determination Theory was used to interpret the resulting categories. Qualitative reporting followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research. RESULTS: Survey responses differed between units in safety climate (32% vs 68%; P = 0.02), stress recognition (57% vs 21%; P = 0.02) and perceptions of management (18% vs 63%; P = 0.002). Interviews yielded four cross-cutting conditions: predictable workflow and usable tools; psychologically safe teamwork; participatory planning with visible follow-through; and learning structures for mastery, with workload as a boundary condition. The same families of practice appeared at both units but were described with differing emphasis. Interpreted through Self-Determination Theory, these conditions supported autonomy, competence and relatedness when present and thwarted them when absent; need-thwarting patterns (late list changes, parallel documentation, sharp communication, tokenistic consultation) co-occurred with workarounds and conditional intentions to stay. CONCLUSION: Among perioperative nursing staff, a sustainable pace was described less as working slowly than as predictable routines, professional judgement over timing, stable teamwork, and protected standards of care under pressure. Modest, auditable routines that jointly support autonomy, competence and relatedness offer transferable, hypothesis-generating design principles for dependable operating-room productivity, rather than a ranking of units.
Reference Key
openalex_W7212126510 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Johan Eriksson, Kristina Lämås, Lena Lindholm, Micael Appelblad, Malin Sund
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/intqhc/mzag130
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzag130
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.