Composition and size of close social networks among older adults in same-sex and different-sex couples

Clicks: 1
ID: 328079
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #103 of 110 articles by views in the journals of gerontology series b, psychological sciences and social sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Objectives This study examines differences in the composition and size of the close social network among older adults in same-sex and different-sex coresidential unions. Methods Using pooled, probability-based, cross-sectional data from the 2006–2022 Health and Retirement Study, weighted fractional probit and negative binomial regression models were estimated to examine differences in close network composition (proportions of close children, immediate family members, and friends) and network size (number of close ties). Results Compared with older adults in different-sex unions, those in same-sex unions reported a higher proportion of friends and a lower proportion of children and immediate family members in their close network, though overall network size was comparable. Supplemental analyses suggested heterogeneity in these patterns. The same-sex versus different-sex gap in friend composition was larger among males than females and was similarly larger among those who were cohabiting than married. Finally, in terms of network size, males in same-sex couples reported smaller close networks than males in different-sex couples, whereas network size was equivalent between females in same-sex and different-sex couples. Discussion Beyond their partners, older adults in same-sex unions cultivate distinctly friend-centered close networks. This pattern reflects a history of intentionally built chosen ties that queers dominant assumptions about who partnered older adults designate as close. These findings affirm the importance of policies and practices that acknowledge diverse family arrangements, particularly those rooted in chosen kinship, as a fundamental step toward achieving social equity.
Reference Key
openalex_W7212121861 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Christopher A. Julian
Journal the journals of gerontology series b, psychological sciences and social sciences
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/geronb/gbag185
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.