Qualitative assessment of the content validity of pruritus patient-reported outcome measures in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome

Clicks: 11
ID: 327808
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #394 of 411 articles by views in the british journal of dermatology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 411 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Using established COSMIN standards, we evaluated the content validity of the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and ItchyQoL in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. Rating the worst itch in the past 24 hours by the NRS had the strongest support for assessing itch intensity, whereas the ItchyQoL captured important impacts on sleep, scratching, and anger/irritability but did not fully reflect the complexity of itch in this population.
Reference Key
openalex_W7211943847 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal the british journal of dermatology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/bjd/ljag379
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.