Co-evolution of Supermassive Black Holes and their Host L ⋆ galaxies: implications for Milky Way and M31

Clicks: 16
ID: 327427
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #817 of 1,339 articles by views in monthly notices of the royal astronomical society

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,339 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract We investigate the origin of the scatter in supermassive black hole (BH) masses among L⋆ galaxies, using the ARTEMIS and EAGLE simulations. We classify galaxies by their central BH-to-stellar mass ratios and track systems with the lowest and highest ratios (LBH and HBH, respectively). Although these populations have similar properties at z ≈ 2, they diverge significantly towards lower redshifts. LBH galaxies maintain higher gas fractions and sustain star formation, while HBHs form stars earlier, experience faster BH growth, more efficient feedback, and subsequent quenching. The simulations broadly match the observed scatter in the BH masses and galaxy morphologies in the L⋆ regime, linking it to differences in merger histories. Galaxies with more active merger histories host more massive BHs at present and are predominantly elliptical, whereas those with quieter histories host lower-mass BHs and tend to be disc-like. Mergers induce BH growth through enhanced gas accretion and direct BH–BH coalescences. However, these channels operate differently: in HBH galaxies, BHs grow primarily (≈90%) through gas accretion, whereas in LBHs they grow through both gas accretion and BH–BH mergers, in comparable fractions. These results suggest that the contrasting BH masses in the Milky Way and M31 may arise from differences in their merger histories. We also investigate the role of feedback from supernovae (SN) versus active galactic nuclei (AGN) on these scales. AGN feedback appears to be the primary mechanism responsible for quenching MW-mass systems, although SN feedback remains the dominant regulator of their overall evolution.
Reference Key
openalex_W7207560652 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal monthly notices of the royal astronomical society
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/mnras/stag1666
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.