Joint Inversion of Seismic and Geoelectrical Data Targeting Geological Faults

Clicks: 14
ID: 327411
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #266 of 338 articles by views in geophysical journal international

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 338 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Near-surface geological faults play a crucial role in subsurface systems because they influence fluid flow and transport and can cause geotechnical failure. Topography can sometimes indicate the presence of fault zones, particularly in active tectonic settings where geomorphic features such as triangular facets are preserved. However, particularly for older inactive faults, characteristic surface geomorphic signatures may have completely been removed by erosion, or the fault may be buried beneath younger sediments. Although direct observations from outcrops or borehole data can confirm the presence of a fault very reliably, such data is commonly too sparse and/or distant to precisely constrain fault location in the target area. In this context, near-surface geophysical methods, such as electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and seismic refraction tomography (SRT), may be useful to locate faults. However, these geophysical data are typically inverted using smoothness-constrained approaches, which can obscure sharp structural features unless the latter are explicitly accounted for in the models. In this study, we present a workflow that enhances the identification of fault zones by jointly inverting collocated ERT and SRT data, considering a parameterization approach based on a layered subsurface model explicitly including a fault. Unlike conventional approaches, we run multiple inversions in which the starting models are initialized with randomly generated fault geometries, guiding the search toward different structural scenarios that yield comparable data misfits. In the absence of additional prior information, these solutions should be interpreted as equally plausible representations of the subsurface. The resulting ensemble of models provides a practical indication of where the structure is well constrained (i.e. features that appear consistently across solutions) and where ambiguity remains (i.e. features that vary among solutions). We showcase the applicability of our workflow with synthetic and field data, where collocated ERT and SRT measurements were collected across expected fault zones. Our results show that the joint inversion of ERT and SRT data consistently narrows the fault location to within a few meters. Iterative incorporation of prior information (e.g., one vs. two boreholes) leads to significant improvements in model geometry and physical property estimates. However, consistent with the intrinsic ambiguity of geophysical inversion, the results remain non-unique; even models depicting opposite fault types (normal vs. reverse) may reproduce the data to comparable levels. This outcome highlights the strength of the workflow in identifying competing structural scenarios that are equally consistent with the observations. Thus, the resulting ensemble provides essential guidance for targeted ground-truthing and follow-up investigations aimed at resolving the remaining ambiguity.
Reference Key
openalex_W7172261680 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Mauricio Arboleda‐Zapata, Olaf Cirpka, Peter Dietrich, Emmanuel Leger, Carsten Leven
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal geophysical journal international
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/gji/ggag361
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggag361
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.