Development and Validation of the GLORIA-AF Stroke Weighted Risk Score for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Clicks: 13
ID: 327361
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #129 of 136 articles by views in EP Europace

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 136 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Accurate stroke-risk stratification is central to anticoagulation decision-making in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but conventional scores may not fully capture risk heterogeneity. We aimed to develop and externally validate an interpretable weighted score using a time-to-event framework. METHODS: GLORIA-AF Phase II/III data were used to evaluate 17 baseline predictors using LASSO-penalized Cox regression with stability selection; coefficients were converted into integer weights. Performance was assessed using discrimination, calibration, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI), and decision-curve analysis. External validation was performed in EORP-AF and APHRS-AF registries. RESULTS: Among 20,517 patients included in the derivation cohort (mean [SD] age, 69.9 [10.3] years; 9,196 women [44.8%]), 487 (2.4%) had stroke, and 17,397 (84.8%) were receiving anticoagulation at baseline. Ten selected predictors formed a 0-23-point score. The derived score achieved a C-index of 0.661 (95% CI, 0.636-0.685), higher than CHA2DS2-VA (0.626; P < 0.001), CHA2DS2-VASc (0.615; P < 0.001), and the unweighted score (P = 0.016), with no significant difference from the full Cox or machine learning models. In external validation (8,309 patients; 147 strokes), the C-index was 0.652 (95% CI, 0.614-0.690) versus 0.616 for CHA2DS2-VA (95%CI, 0.598-0.634; P < 0.001). IDI/NRI, calibration, and decision-curve analyses supported improved risk differentiation, close calibration, and generally greater net benefit than CHA2DS2-VA. The score retained higher discrimination than CHA2DS2-VA among patients without baseline anticoagulation (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The GLORIA-AF Stroke Weighted Risk Score provides risk refinement beyond CHA2DS2-VA while retaining discrimination consistent with more complex models. External validation supports its transportability and potential adjunctive role in guideline-directed thromboembolic risk assessment.
Reference Key
openalex_W7204661650 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Yifan Xie, Wenhui Li, Yanda Meng, Tianjin Huang, Yalin Zheng, Menno V. Huisman, Giuseppe Boriani, Abigail Louise D. Te, Gregory Y.H. Lip
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal EP Europace
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/europace/euag236
URL
https://academic.oup.com/europace/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/europace/euag236/70828216/euag236.pdf
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.