Sex-specific Patterns of Valvulo-Aortopathy in Bicuspid Aortic Valve According to the International Consensus Framework: Insights from the RE-BAV Registry

Clicks: 18
ID: 327163
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #98 of 157 articles by views in European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 157 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
AIMS: To characterise sex-specific patterns of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) valvulo-aortopathy using consensus phenotyping and to assess how aortic normalisation strategies influence sex-related differences in aortic dimensions. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 808 adults with BAV (mean age 49.9 ± 17.5 years; 588 men) from the RE-BAV registry. Valve morphology, aortopathy phenotypes, and clinical valvulo-aortopathy categories were classified according to consensus definitions. Typical and uncomplicated forms were additionally analysed together as a non-complex category. Proximal aortic dimensions were defined as the aortic root and ascending aorta.Valve morphology distribution did not differ by sex. Although the prevalence of aortic dilatation was similar, phenotype distribution differed: women more frequently exhibited the extended phenotype (34.7% vs 23.3%, p = 0.001), whereas the root phenotype was more common in men (15.1% vs 7.8%, p = 0.006). Moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation was more prevalent in men (50.3% vs 29.1%, p < 0.001). Sex differences in proximal aortic dimensions varied by normalisation strategy. For the ascending aorta, indexing to body surface area yielded larger values in women (21.1 ± 4.0 vs 20.0 ± 4.0 mm/m2, p = 0.001), whereas diameter/height showed no sex-related difference at this level. Conversely, the cross-sectional area-to-height ratio remained higher in men across proximal segments, most prominently at the sinuses of Valsalva (6.9 ± 2.0 vs 5.6 ± 1.6 cm2/m, p < 0.001). Age was independently associated with larger proximal aortic dimensions across all strategies. CONCLUSION: Sex-related differences in BAV involved aortopathy phenotype, aortic regurgitation burden, and proximal aortic dimensions. Interpretation of proximal aortic dimensions depended on the normalisation strategy used, indicating that indexing methods should not be treated as interchangeable.
Reference Key
openalex_W7204813538 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ehjci/jeag233
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.