Does the National Resident Matching Program Rank List Predict Accreditation College of Graduate Medical Education Trainee Performance Among Multispecialty Pain Medicine Fellows? A Multicenter Study

Clicks: 13
ID: 326941
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #39 of 59 articles by views in regional anesthesia and pain medicine

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Training programs seek to match fellows who will perform well during training. The National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) allows programs to choose the most capable trainees, with higher ranked applicants expected to perform better. Pain medicine is one of the most popular non-internal medicine fellowships in the U.S., and multiple specialty pathways for entry make selecting candidates challenging. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to correlate fellow rank order and match number with academic performance. METHODS: Match information and fellow performance from 4 highly-ranked multispecialty pain programs was obtained with performance evaluated based on the 6 final Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) core competencies. The primary analysis correlated each fellow's relative rank-list position with relative subsequent ACGME performance within the same institution and fellowship cohort using cohort-relative percentile ranks, Spearman correlation, stratified permutation testing, and stratified bootstrap confidence intervals. Sensitivity and exploratory analyses used absolute/converted match-number fixed-effects regression, Kendall Tau-B, sex stratification, and domain-specific correlations with false discovery rate adjustment. RESULTS: The primary analysis included 93 fellows across 20 institution/cohort strata. Rank-list standing was not significantly associated with ACGME performance (Spearman r = 0.06; 95% CI, -0.19 to 0.32; p = 0.63), and sensitivity, sex-stratified, and domain-specific analyses were also nonsignificant. When stratified according to top-, middle- and bottom-ranked applicants, all domains were significant with bottom-ranked fellows faring worse than other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pain medicine rank lists correlate poorly with fellowship performance, though a weak association was noted wherein bottom-ranked applicants performed worse. This suggests that either the metrics used to rank pain medicine applicants and/or those used to measure performance require modification.
Reference Key
openalex_W7205009148 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Steven P. Cohen, Oludare Olatoye, Peter Schumaker, Dalia Elmofty, Heejung Choi, Bhavana Yalamuru, Lynn Kohan
Journal regional anesthesia and pain medicine
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/pm/pnag117
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnag117
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.