Far From Home? Accessing Everyday Places in Rural and Urban Communities

Clicks: 17
ID: 326900
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #102 of 133 articles by views in the journals of gerontology series b, psychological sciences and social sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 133 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Rural residents are believed to experience greater social isolation than their urban counterparts. This isolation is typically attributed to the structural conditions that distinguish rural communities from urban communities. In the present study, we direct attention to the everyday places that older adults visit across the rural-urban context and the implications this has for direct and indirect social exposure. METHODS: We leverage ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data from the Social Environment and Cognitive Health in Urban and Rural Areas study. Two hundred and forty-eight participants recorded 4,906 valid EMAs. We explore the probability of EMAs being recorded outside the home and how far each EMA was recorded from home based on driving distance and time. RESULTS: There were no rural-urban differences in the probability of participants being away from home during their EMAs. However, rural participants were located farther from home than urban participants during their non-home EMAs. These latter differences were largely explained by trips to restaurants, stores, and healthcare facilities. There were no observed differences in the time separating participants from their workplaces, other people's homes, religious centers, or other outdoor spaces. DISCUSSION: Although rural and urban older adults visit the same types of places at remarkably similar rates, rural residents face greater travel burdens when accessing commercial places (e.g., restaurants, stores, and healthcare facilities). These findings suggest that the rural disadvantage is concentrated in commercial activity and carries implications for the types of social exposures that residents are likely to encounter depending on where they live.
Reference Key
openalex_W7204991362 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Adam R. Roth, Siyun Peng, Jafnun Nudrat Jarin, Maleah Fekete, Tianyao Qu
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal the journals of gerontology series b, psychological sciences and social sciences
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/geronb/gbag183
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbag183
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.