56 The evolving challenges and opportunities in adult brain tumour imaging: Insights from a review of United Kingdom neuro-oncology centres (2021-2024)

Clicks: 15
ID: 326813
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #231 of 286 articles by views in journal of neuro-oncology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 286 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Brain tumour imaging is rapidly changing: while new technologies promise clinical advances, centres report growing staff shortages and burnout at a time of increasing demand. We examined how these trends have evolved since 2021 in United Kingdom (UK) neuro-oncology centres. Method Data were collected from 21 UK neuro-oncology centres (covering ∼84% of the population) in 2021 and 2024 via the Tessa Jowell Centre of Excellence for Adults programme. Anonymised data were analysed to identify trends in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) waiting and reporting times, neuroradiologist capacity, MRI equipment availability, and adoption of advanced techniques. Results MRI waiting and reporting times: Between 2021 and 2024, waiting times from request to report for brain tumour MRI increased across centres. Mean urgent outpatient scan turnaround time increased by 28% (12.7 to 16.3 days) and wait times for routine scans increased by 14% (43.9 to 49.8 days). Delayed reporting times drove this increase, with 18/21 centres (86%) citing challenges including workforce shortages (67%), rising demand, and equipment shortages (both 44%). Staffing and equipment Neuroradiology staffing varied widely (4–27 neuroradiologists per centre; median 11), as did equipment provision (3–20 MRI scanners per centre; median 7). Variation in imaging protocols Centres used an average of 31 different protocols at key imaging timepoints, indicating limited harmonisation. Innovation More centres reported use of advanced techniques, and over half (11/21, 52%) reported radiology involvement in neuro-oncology research. Conclusions Despite increased adoption of innovation, brain tumour imaging services face delays amid rising demand, workforce pressures, and equipment shortages. These results will inform efforts by the Tessa Jowell Brain Cancer Mission and partners to support sustainable investment, greater harmonisation of imaging practice, and ongoing national quality improvement.
Reference Key
openalex_W7204483494 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Adam Waldman, Samantha Mills, Andrew Wright, Camille Goetz, Nicky Huskens
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal journal of neuro-oncology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/neuonc/noag172.050
URL
https://academic.oup.com/neuro-oncology/article-pdf/28/Supplement_1/noag172.050/70805897/noag172.050.pdf
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.