Examining the effectiveness of a nationwide place-based policy approach to improving physical activity participation: a controlled interrupted time series analysis

Clicks: 11
ID: 326392
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #51 of 96 articles by views in turkish journal of public health

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Aim Physical inactivity is a persistent public health challenge in England, linked to non-communicable diseases, poor mental health, and health inequalities. Therefore, in 2016, Sport England launched 12 local delivery pilots (LDPs) as part of the ‘Towards an Active Nation’ strategy. These aimed to reduce inactivity through whole-systems and place-based approaches. Despite extensive process evaluation, little is known on the population-level impact of these programmes on physical activity participation. Subject and methods To understand this, we utilised controlled interrupted time series analysis using Active Lives Survey data from 2015 to 2023 ( n = 1,437,748 adults) to examine the impact of LDPs on moderate equivalent minutes (MEMs) of physical activity. We compared trends in LDP areas against location-based control areas (non-LDP areas) and examined variation between individual LDPs. Results Analysis revealed that MEMs were declining in LDP areas during baseline ( β = −1.16 min/month, p = 0.005). Following LDP implementation, this decline slowed ( β = +0.61, p = 0.051), and reversed post-funding ( β = +1.16, p = 0.051). However, when accounting for control areas, analysis demonstrated no statistically meaningful differences between LDP and control trajectories during implementation ( β = −0.94, p = 0.29), post-LDP ( β = −0.85, p = 0.58), or COVID-19 periods ( β = −0.29, p = 0.81). Analysis of individual LDPs similarly showed no significant improvements in MEMs compared with controls. Conclusion The lack of improvement may be due to the focus on ‘downstream’ leverage points and time delays inherent in systems-change approaches. Moreover, for whole-systems approaches to be successful, there is a need for sustained implementation, shared commitment, and a focus on ‘upstream’ leverage points.
Reference Key
openalex_W7204212593 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Andrew Brinkley, Paul Freeman
Journal turkish journal of public health
Year 2026
DOI
10.1007/s10389-026-02864-3
URL
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-026-02864-3
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.