PD06.09. Second-Line Treatment Efficacy in Functional Heartburn Based on HRM and MII-pH Evaluation

Clicks: 18
ID: 326124
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #311 of 453 articles by views in diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the international society for diseases of the esophagus

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 453 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Topic Benign Disease: Gastro-Esophageal Reflux and Hiatal Hernia Background Functional heartburn (FH) accounts for approximately half of patients with proton pump inhibitor (PPI)- or vonoprazan-refractory non-erosive reflux symptoms. However, the clinical characteristics of FH and the efficacy of second-line therapies remain incompletely understood. We evaluated patient characteristics and treatment outcomes following physiological evaluation. Methods Between September 2013 and December 2025, we retrospectively reviewed patients with PPI- or vonoprazan-refractory heartburn who underwent high-resolution manometry (HRM) and multichannel intraluminal impedance–pH (MII-pH) monitoring after discontinuation of acid-suppressive therapy at our institution. FH was diagnosed according to the updated Lyon Consensus 2.0 criteria. Clinical characteristics were compared between FH and true NERD. Symptom severity was assessed using the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD (FSSG). We evaluated comorbid conditions diagnosed after FH identification and analyzed the type and efficacy of second-line therapies. Treatment response was defined as a ≥50% reduction in FSSG score. Results Among 303 MII-pH studies, 125 patients were evaluated off acid-suppressive therapy for refractory heartburn, and 47 (38%) were diagnosed with FH. Compared with true NERD, FH patients were more often female (58.4% vs. 29.6%, p=0.008), younger (59.0 vs. 69.0 years, p=0.03), and had lower BMI (21.3 vs. 23.7, p<0.001). The GSRS indigestion score was higher in FH (10.0 vs. 8.5, p=0.047). Fifteen patients were subsequently diagnosed with psychiatric, cardiovascular, otolaryngological, or orthopedic conditions, with symptom improvement following appropriate treatment. Among 15 patients receiving second-line therapy with evaluable FSSG scores, 10 (66.7%) achieved ≥50% symptom improvement. SSRIs significantly reduced median FSSG scores from 20 (17.5–26.0) to 7.0 (4.0–10.5) (p=0.018). Acid-suppressive therapy was discontinued in 61.7% of FH patients. Conclusion FH demonstrated distinct clinical characteristics compared with true NERD. Following comprehensive physiological evaluation using HRM and MII-pH, second-line therapies—particularly SSRIs—were associated with substantial symptom improvement. Physiologically guided, individualized management may improve outcomes in patients with FH.
Reference Key
openalex_W7203980086 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the international society for diseases of the esophagus
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/dote/doag077.121
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.