OA08.3. Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeon Perspective: Sleeve-Based Versus Roux-en-Y Bariatric Metabolic Surgery Affects De Novo and Improved EE, Hiatal Hernia, Barrett’s Esophagus

Clicks: 21
ID: 326042
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #149 of 453 articles by views in diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the international society for diseases of the esophagus

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 453 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Topic Benign Disease: Gastro-Esophageal Reflux and Hiatal Hernia Background Bariatric surgery can alter reflux-related and premalignant esophageal conditions, yet the endoscopic trajectories of erosive esophagitis (EE), hiatal hernia (HH), and Barrett’s esophagus (BE)—and the impact of procedure type and cruroplasty as hiatal hernia repair (HHR)—remain incompletely defined. We evaluated incidence, improvement, and predictors of de novo and preoperative EE, HH, and BE one year after metabolic bariatric surgery. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 277 patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (n=123), sleeve gastrectomy with proximal jejunal bypass (PJB-SG) (n=113), or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (n=41). Preoperative and 1-year postoperative endoscopic findings were compared. Multivariable logistic regression assessed predictors of new-onset and improved EE, HH, and BE, adjusting for age, sex, surgical procedure, baseline endoscopic diagnoses, and HHR. Results De novo endoscopic lesions occurred in 62 patients (49 SG-based; 13 RYGB). Older age independently predicted de novo EE (OR 1.046, p=0.013), while RYGB was protective (OR 0.303, p=0.010). For postoperative HH, absence of HHR was associated with increased risk (OR 0.508, p=0.026). De novo BE was associated with concomitant HHR (OR 2.987, p=0.027). Among 215 patients with preoperative disease, RYGB was associated with improvement of EE (OR 0.304, p=0.046). HHR reduced HH recurrence (OR 0.487, p=0.032) but was associated with higher postoperative BE risk (OR 3.735, p=0.015). Conclusion Upper gastrointestinal endoscopic outcomes after metabolic bariatric surgery vary by procedure and HHR. SG-based procedures showed higher susceptibility to de novo EE and BE, whereas RYGB was protective and favored improvement of preoperative EE. HHR decreased HH recurrence but was associated with increased BE risk, underscoring the need for individualized procedure selection and structured post-operative endoscopic surveillance.
Reference Key
openalex_W7203994100 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the international society for diseases of the esophagus
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/dote/doag077.055
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.