Genome-resolved assessment of archaeal diversity in full-scale anaerobic digesters reveals variability in mcrA primer coverage

Clicks: 27
ID: 326004
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #110 of 220 articles by views in Journal of applied microbiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 220 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Aims Methanogenic archaea are key players in anaerobic digestion, driving methane production in biogas reactors. This study aimed to assess the diversity of methanogenic archaea in full-scale anaerobic digesters using genome-resolved metagenomics and to systematically evaluate the taxonomic coverage of commonly used mcrA-targeted qPCR primer sets against this genomic framework. Methods and Results Methanogenic diversity was assessed using 113 dereplicated archaeal metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) recovered from 109 full-scale anaerobic digesters treating diverse substrates. Genome-resolved analyses revealed a diverse archaeal community spanning multiple phyla, dominated by Halobacteriota and Methanobacteriota, with additional representatives from Methanobacteriota_B, Thermoplasmatota, and Thermoproteota. The presence of the mcrA gene was identified in a subset 55 MAGs, which were subsequently used as the genomic framework to evaluate six commonly used mcrA qPCR primer sets in silico. This subset clustered into nine phylogenetic groups and formed the basis for the primer coverage analysis. The evaluation revealed marked differences in taxonomic coverage among primer sets. Most primers preferentially detected Methanobacteriales and Methanosarcinales, while underrepresenting or excluding other methanogenic lineages, including H₂-dependent methylotrophic Methanomassiliicoccaceae. Conclusions Commonly used mcrA primer sets differ substantially in their ability to capture methanogenic diversity, with some showing broad representation of reactor-associated methanogens and others exhibiting strong lineage-specific biases. Genome-resolved metagenomics provides an effective framework for benchmarking primer performance and supports the selection and improvement of molecular tools for more accurate monitoring of anaerobic digestion systems.
Reference Key
openalex_W7204005694 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Cecilia Callejas, Patricia Bovio-Winkler, Claudia Etchebehere
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Journal of applied microbiology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jambio/lxag212
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxag212
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.