P1.202. Management and Outcomes of Anastomotic Leak After Oesophagectomy in Patients With Oesophageal Cancer

Clicks: 22
ID: 325997
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #103 of 453 articles by views in diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the international society for diseases of the esophagus

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 453 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Topic Esophageal Cancer: Surgical Treatment of Esophageal Cancer – early outcomes and complications Background Anastomotic leak (AL) after oesophagectomy is a dreaded complication with significant implications on patient outcomes. Early detection of leak, advances in perioperative care and management techniques may improve long-term outcomes. This study was performed to assess the management patterns of anastomotic leak and its short-term and long-term consequences. Methods A retrospective study was conducted of 324 patients who underwent oesophagectomy between January 2015 and December 2024 at a tertiary cancer hospital. Patients who developed anastomotic leak were included for the analysis. Demographic and clinical data were retrieved from prospectively maintained electronic medical records. Surgical outcomes, management patterns and survival data were analyzed using SPSS. Results Fifty-one patients (16%) developed AL during this period. Majority (80%) had SCC and 94% received neoadjuvant therapy. Forty-two patients (82%) underwent transthoracic oesophagectomy and nine (18%) had Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy. AL was confined to the neck in 26 (51%) patients and managed conservatively. Mediastinal leaks were managed with CT-guided drainage (15 patients), endoscopic vacuum therapy (4 patients) and surgical re-exploration (7patients) which led to prolonged hospital stay of 17 days (IQR:14-24). Post-operative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo 3 and higher) occurred in 28 (55%) patients and mortality in 6 (12%). Subsequent strictures developed in 20 patients (40%) who required a median of 4 oesophageal dilatations in the first post-operative year. After a median follow-up of 19 months, 11 (22%) patients recurred, most (9) with distant metastases. The median overall survival of the cohort was 56months and 5-yr survival rate was 47%. There was no significant survival difference in patients with or without AL(p>0.5). Conclusion Anastomotic leak after oesophagectomy was associated with worse short-term outcomes like prolonged hospital stay (17 vs 12 days) and stricture rates (40% vs 8.8%) but not statistically significant difference in long-term survival when compared to patients without leak. Further large-scale studies have to be done to analyse the long-term impact of advances in endoscopic management techniques of anastomotic leak.
Reference Key
openalex_W7204007662 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the international society for diseases of the esophagus
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/dote/doag077.350
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.